Aluminum Chloride, Basic
CASRN#
1327-41-9
INCI Name
Alternate Names
Basic aluminum chloride, hydrate; Basic aluminum chloride; ALUMINUM SESQUICHLORHYDRATE; Aluminum oxychloride; Aluminum chlorohydrol; Aluminum chloride oxide; Aluminum chloride hydroxide oxide, basic; Aluminum chlorhydroxide; Aluminium hydroxychloride;, Aluminium chloride, basic; Aluminiumchlorid, basisch; Aluminum chloride, basic (U.S. EPA 2024a). Aluminium chloride basic; Aluminum chloride, basic; ACH, PAC; Aluminium chloride hydroxide; Polyaluminium chloride; Aluminium chloride; , Aluminium Chloride, Basic; Aluminium chlorine, basic; Aluminium chlorohydrate; Aluminium Hydroxy Chloride; Aluminium Trichloride; aluminium(3+) dichloride hydroxide; aluminium(3+) ion trichloride; Aluminium(3+)ion dichloride hydroxide;, Aluminum Chloride, basic; Aluminum chlorohydrate; Aluminum trichloride; chlorure d'aluminium; MO-PAC 18S, MO-PAC 14 HBL; PAC; Polialumínium-klorid oldat; Policloruro de Aluminio; Poly aluminium chloride (PAC); Polyaluminium chloride, PAC; , Polyaluminiumchloride; POLYALUMINUM CHLORIDE HYDROXIDE; Polyaluminum chloride, PAC; Steinfloc PAC; Trichloroalumane (ECHA, CAS #1327-41-9, 2024).
Common Trade Names
Cartafix LA; Berukotan AC-P; Banoltan White; Astringen 10; Astringen; Aquaserv AQ 292; Aquarhone 18; Aquarhone; Aluminol ACH; Aloxicoll LR; Aloxicoll L; Aloxicoll (U.S. EPA 2024a). , Aluminium chloride, aqueous solution; AQUAFLOC P18; DKFLOC 1018; Ekofix; EPOCA18; FLOQUAT™ PAC 18; Polyaluminium Chloride; Polyaluminium chloride; Povimal; Sachpur; Sachtoklar; Steinfloc PAC; Unipac W2 (ECHA, CAS #1327-41-9, 2024). , Astringen; Chlorhydrol; Locron (ILS 2000).
Molecular Weight
174.45 g/mol
Functional Uses
odor agent (NICNAS 2014), water treatment chemical and active ingredient in deodorants and antiperspirants (ILS 2000).
Common Impurities
-
Is this a VOC?
No
Is this an exempt VOC?
No
Vapor Pressure
-
Octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow)
-
Solubility
-
Boiling Point
N/A
Particle size range as aerodynamic diameter
- - - μm
Hazard Summary
C2C Chemical Rating
x/c-CMR(1)
GHS Health
H314H318H334H360H372H341H373
GHS Enviro
H400H410
Assessed by
ToxServices LLC
Assessment Date
May 2, 2024
Verification Status

Verified

CHA Validity and Confidence Comments
None
GHS Methodology Version
Rev 10
C2CC Material Health Assessment Methodology Version
v4.0
ChemFORWARD Chemical Rating Guidance
v2.4
CHA PDF
Executive Summary
Background of ChemFORWARD Screening: A ChemFORWARD chemical hazard assessment (CHA) is conducted following ChemFORWARD Assessor Guidance (v 2.0, dated August 11, 2023, and Amendment: Polymer Assessment, dated June, 2022), and comprises a comprehensive evaluation and hazard classification of 24 human health and environmental toxicity endpoints, based on criteria from the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Substances (GHS) and Cradle to Cradle Certified® Material Health Assessment Methodology, version 4 (C2CMHAM)(v.4.0) (C2CPII 2022a) and Cradle to Cradle Certified Exposure Assessment Methodology (C2CPII 2022b). As the evaluation includes assessment of oral, dermal, and inhalation routes of exposure, a ChemFORWARD CHA includes over 50 written rationales and data summaries to support conclusions and hazard classifications. Each ChemFORWARD hazard endpoint assessed using GHS receives a numerical GHS Category rating, with lower hazard categories indicating a higher hazard, or a classification of “NC” (not classified), indicating that available data do not support a hazard classification according to GHS criteria. ChemFORWARD also utilizes “E” (equivocal) when data are not discerning, and “CNP” (classification not possible) in instances where there are no data or insufficient data. As there are no GHS classification criteria for endocrine activity, the phrases “No data identified” or “Insufficient data” may apply. ChemFORWARD hazard endpoints assessed under Cradle to Cradle Certified® methodology (“C2C”) receive ratings of Green, Yellow, Red, or Grey to indicate a low, moderate, or high hazard, or insufficient data, respectively. It may be noted that the combination of endpoints assessed under Terrestrial Toxicity, Other (Human Health), and Other (Environmental Health) are derived from C2C Certified® methodology; therefore, a ChemFORWARD screen assesses these endpoints only with color codes. Background of Aluminum Chloride, Basic: Aluminum chloride, basic is glassy solid under standard temperature and pressure and functions as an odor agent, water treatment chemical, and active ingredient in deodorants and antiperspirants. Since it is an inorganic aluminum salt, it is not a VOC. Screening Results: Human Health, Environmental, Cradle to Cradle Certified® Hazards: Human health hazards associated with aluminum chloride, basic include mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity (oral), developmental toxicity (oral), endocrine activity, repeated exposure specific target organ toxicity (inhalation), repeated exposure neurotoxicity (oral), respiratory sensitization, skin irritation, and eye irritation. Related soluble aluminum salts, including aluminum chloride and aluminum sulfate, were used to fill some (but not all) data gaps. Remaining data gaps include reproductive toxicity (dermal, inhalation), developmental toxicity (dermal, inhalation), lactation toxicity, acute toxicity (inhalation), single exposure specific target organ toxicity (inhalation), repeated exposure specific target organ toxicity (dermal), single exposure neurotoxicity (inhalation), repeated exposure neurotoxicity (dermal, inhalation), and respiratory irritation. No reasonable surrogates with relevant data were identified to fill these data gaps.Environmental concerns include acute and/or chronic toxicity potential towards aquatic biota. As an inorganic salt at its most stable valence, aluminum chloride, basic is not rapidly degradable. Following Cradle to Cradle Certified® Products Program Material Health Assessment Methodology (C2CMHAM)(v. 4.0) (C2CPII 2022a), the overall C2C chemical hazard rating for aluminum chloride, basic is Red, based on the worst individual endpoint rating of Red for mutagenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, inhalation toxicity, respiratory sensitization, skin and eye irritation, other (human health) for corrosion of metals, and the combined aquatic toxicity risk flag. Following the exposure assessment component of a C2C Material Health Assessment as described in Section 2.2 (Process Steps) and Section 4 (Exposure Assessment and Assigning Risk Flags) of the C2CPII MHAM (C2CPII 2022a) and C2CPII’s Exposure Assessment Methodology (C2CPII 2022b), this hazard rating will be used to assign either a Yellow or Red risk flag based on likely use/manufacture scenarios of the product containing this chemical. The Red rating for other (human health) is intended to identify other potential hazards not covered by other endpoints. In a C2C Material Health assessment, a Red rating for other (human health) serves as a reminder to consider this additional hazard information in the risk assessment step conducted as part of a C2C Material Health assessment. Overall Hazard Assessment for Aluminum Chloride, Basic: Aluminum chloride, basic has a relatively robust health effects dataset for the oral route of exposure, with health hazards identified for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity and repeated exposure neurotoxicity. No hazards were identified for the dermal route, although data gaps exist for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, repeated exposure specific target organ toxicity and repeated exposure neurotoxicity. The only health hazard classified for the inhalation route of exposure is repeated exposure specific target organ toxicity, although data gaps exist for reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, acute toxicity, single exposure specific target organ toxicity, and single and repeated exposure neurotoxicity. Aluminum chloride, basic is genotoxic, corrosive to the skin and eyes and is sensitizing to the respiratory tract, but is not a skin sensitizer. It also has an endocrine disruption potential. There are insufficient data to classify this chemical as a respiratory irritant, or assess whether this chemical is a lactation toxicant. In terms of environmental hazards, aluminum chloride, basic poses an acute hazard to fish, crustacea, and algae and a chronic hazard to algae. It is not rapidly degradable but may dissociate to its constituent ions and is not likely to bioaccumulate. It is not likely to pose a hazard to soil organisms.In terms of physical hazards, aluminum chloride, basic is not flammable, explosive, or oxidizing but is corrosive to metals. For purposes of performing a cosmetics ingredient safety assessment, a NOAEL of 26 mg/kg/day (converted from a NOAEL of 8.06 mg Al/kg/day) point of departure is recommended for aluminum chloride, basic, and is based on the NOAEL from a GLP-compliant two-generation reproduction toxicity test in rats exposed to the surrogate aluminum sulfate and a safety factor of 1. This study was selected as the key study in United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA)’s risk assessment of aluminum sulfate (U.S. EPA 2015).New Alternative Methods (NAMs) used in this assessment comprise in vitro assays for genotoxicity, endocrine activity, and skin irritation. The quality, utility, and accuracy of NAM predictions are greatly influenced by two primary types of uncertainties (OECD 2020):• Type I: Uncertainties related to the input data used• Type II: Uncertainties related to extrapolations madeType I (input data) uncertainties in aluminum chloride, basic’s NAMs dataset include no or insufficient experimental data for respiratory sensitization and endocrine disruption, and lack of established test methods for respiratory sensitization. Aluminum chloride, basic’s Type II (extrapolation output) uncertainties include limitations of in vitro genotoxicity assays in mimicking in vivo metabolism and their focusing on one or only a few types of genotoxicity events, the inability of the in vitro endocrine activity testing to account for the in vivo bioavailability of the compound, and the OECD Guideline 435 test only being able to positively identify corrosive substances. Some of aluminum chloride, basic’s type II uncertainties were alleviated by the use of in vitro test batteries and/or in combination of in vivo data.
Hazard Tables

How to read the GHS Hazard Summary Table

 
Carcinogenicity
Mutagenicity
Reproductive Toxicity
Developmental Toxicity
Acute Toxicity
STOT-Single
STOT-Repeated
STOT- Neurotoxicity-Single
STOT- Neurotoxicity-Repeated
Skin Sensitizer
Respiratory Sensitizer
Skin Corrosion/Irritation
Serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation
Acute Aquatic Toxicity
Chronic Aquatic Toxicity
Ozone Depletion
Oral
Dermal
Inhalation
NC
Rationale
Based on the lack of evidence demonstrating aluminum compounds are carcinogenic in humans and the conclusions by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) that aluminum compounds are not carcinogenic, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a carcinogen via the oral route of exposure under GHS criteria (UN 2023). The confidence in the classification is low due to conflicting and limited animal data. The lack of classification under GHS criteria with support from animal data corresponds to a C2C rating of Green.
NC
Rationale
Based on the lack of evidence demonstrating aluminum compounds are carcinogenic in humans and the conclusions by EFSA and ATSDR that aluminum compounds are not carcinogenic in humans, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a carcinogen via the dermal route of exposure under GHS criteria (UN 2023). The confidence in the classification is low due to the lack of long-term dermal cancer studies on the chemical or surrogate. The lack of experimental data corresponds to a C2C rating of Grey.
NC
Rationale
Based on the lack of evidence demonstrating aluminum compounds are carcinogenic in humans and the conclusions by EFSA and ATSDR that aluminum compounds are not carcinogenic in humans, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a carcinogen via the inhalation route of exposure under GHS criteria (UN 2023). The confidence in the classification is low due to the lack of long-term inhalation cancer studies on the chemical or surrogate. The lack of experimental data corresponds to a C2C rating of Grey.
Cat 2
Rationale
Although the REACH dossier reported negative mutagenicity and clastogenicity studies for surrogate aluminum sulfate, EFSA (2018a) reported positive results in both in vitro and in vivo intraperitoneal administration studies performed with surrogates and concluded that there is evidence of a genotoxic effect for aluminum compounds through indirect and threshold mechanisms that are not relevant to low dietary exposure levels. However, in the present hazard assessment, the potential hazard cannot be dismissed based on EFSA’s conclusion that the risk for genotoxicity is low due to dietary exposures. One intraperitoneal study reported clastogenic effects in spermatocytes, but the majority of studies evaluated found effects only in somatic cells; therefore, ToxServices considered GHS Category 2 to be the most appropriate classification for aluminum chloride, basic. The confidence in the classification is low as results for surrogates are mixed, and positive results often occurred at toxic doses. The GHS Category 2 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
Cat 2
Rationale
Chemicals are classified as GHS Category 2 reproductive toxicants when they produce adverse effects on sexual function and fertility. Aluminum chloride, basic itself did not produce adverse effects on reproduction at doses up to 290 mg/kg/day as calculated by ToxServices, in an OECD 422 Combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test in rats. Surrogate aluminum sulfate anhydrous did not produce reproductive toxicities in a two-generation study in rats. However, surrogate aluminum chloride reduced male reproductive organ weights and semen quality and quantity in a subchronic study in rabbits. EFSA's review on aluminum salts concludes clear testicular toxicity, sperm quality, and reduced fertility in mice after intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administrations, and EFSA noted that although male reproductive effects were not found in rats, rats may be less sensitive than humans as they are known to maintain fertility despite testicular lesions. Therefore, ToxServices considered the rabbit study on aluminum chloride relevant, and classified aluminum chloride, basic to GHS Category 2. Confidence is low due to the low number of animals used (6/dose), and non-GLP/guideline status of the rabbit study, and the uncertainty regarding whether the reproductive organ effects translate to reproductive functional deficiencies. The LOAEL of 11 mg/kg/day in this study corresponds to a C2C Red hazard rating.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
Cat 1B
Rationale
Based on strong evidence of developmental neurotoxicity in animals due to the bioavailable aluminum metal and a classification to GHS Category 1B developmental toxicant by the Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN) for water soluble aluminum compounds, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 1B developmental toxicant via the oral route of exposure. Confidence in the classification is high as it is based on the weight of evidence and opinions by EFSA, HCN, and ATSDR. ToxServices calculated a neurodevelopmental NOAEL of 32 mg/kg/day for aluminum chloride, basic based on EFSA’s lowest neurodevelopmental toxicity NOAEL of 10 mg Al/kg/day. This value falls below the C2C threshold of 50 mg/kg/day; accordingly, ToxServices assigned a C2C hazard rating of Red for this endpoint.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define acute oral toxicants as chemicals that produce oral LD50s ≤ 2,000 mg/kg. Based on the oral LD50s > 2,000 mg/kg for surrogate soluble aluminum salts, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as an acute oral toxicant under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data for strong surrogates. The lack of GHS classification and the LD50 corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define acute dermal toxicants as chemicals that produce dermal LD50s ≤ 2,000 mg/kg. Based on a dermal LD50 value > 2,000 mg/kg for the surrogate aluminum sulfate, hydrate, ToxServices did not classify aluminum, chloride, basic as an acute dermal toxicant under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data on a strong surrogate. This corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
CNP
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) classify vapors and dusts/mists/aerosols as acutely toxic when they produce 4-hour LC50 values ≤ 20 mg/L and ≤ 5 mg/L, respectively. Since the surrogate aluminum chloride hydroxide sulfate was tested only up to an aerosol concentration of 1.6 mg/L after correction for evaporable water content, insufficient data are available to determine if it has an LC50 ≤ 5 mg/L. Therefore, GHS classification is not possible for this endpoint. This corresponds to a C2C Grey rating.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) classify chemicals as specific target organ dose toxicants following single oral exposures when systemic toxicity is detected at single oral doses ≤ 2,000 mg/kg. Based on the lack of treatment-related systemic toxicity observed in acute oral toxicity studies performed with surrogate soluble aluminum salts, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a specific target organ dose toxicant following single oral exposures under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on measured data for strong surrogates. The classification corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) classify chemicals as specific target organ dose toxicants following single dermal exposures when systemic toxicity is detected at single dermal doses ≤ 2,000 mg/kg. Based on the lack of treatment-related systemic toxicity observed in an acute dermal toxicity study with the surrogate aluminum sulfate, hydrate, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a specific target organ dose toxicant following single dermal exposures under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on measured data for a strong surrogate. The classification corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) identifies oral guidance values of 10 and 100 mg/kg/day for subchronic repeated oral dose toxicity studies. For 28-day studies, the GHS guidance values are adjusted by a factor of 3 (28 days is approximately one-third of 90 days) to 30 and 300 mg/kg/day, respectively. Based on EFSA (2018) reporting that the lowest NOAEL in subchronic studies is 52 mg Al/kg/day in rats and 90 mg Al/kg/day in dogs, equivalent to 168 and 290 mg/kg/day for rats and dogs, respectively, for aluminum chloride, basic according to ToxServices’ calculations, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a specific target organ toxicant following repeated oral doses under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on an authoritative review. The GHS not classified corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
Cat 1
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define specific target organ toxicants following repeated inhalation exposures as chemicals that produce aerosol/mist/dust LOAECs ≤ 0.02 mg/L (Category 1) or ≤ 0.2 mg/L (Category 2) in subchronic (90-day) studies. The surrogate aluminum chloride hexahydrate altered hematology parameters in rats in a subchronic repeated inhalation exposure study, with a LOAEC of 0.000357 mg/L/6h/day. As the LOAEC is less than the GHS guidance value of 0.2 mg/L, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a Category 1 specific target organ toxicant following repeated inhalation exposures. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data for a strong surrogate. The GHS Category 1 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define chemicals as specific target organ toxicant following single oral doses when they produce non-lethal neurotoxicity following single oral doses ≤ 2,000 mg/kg (Categories 1 or 2) or reversible narcotic effects (defined as ataxia, narcosis, lethargy, and lack of coordination righting reflex) at any dose (Category 3). The surrogate soluble aluminum slats did not produce evidence of neurotoxicity based on clinical signs and gross pathology in an acute dermal toxicity test. Reversible mild depression was reported only in one of the three studies identified, and it likely reflected the general toxicity rather than specific narcotic effects. Therefore, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a specific target organ toxicant following single oral exposures due to neurotoxicity or narcotic effects. The confidence in the classification is low as the acute toxicity studies did not include detailed functional analyses. This classification corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
NC
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define chemicals as specific target organ toxicant following single dermal doses when they produce non-lethal neurotoxicity following single dermal doses ≤ 2,000 mg/kg (Categories 1 or 2) or reversible narcotic effects (defined as ataxia, narcosis, lethargy, and lack of coordination righting reflex) at any dose (Category 3). The surrogate aluminum sulfate, hydrate did not produce evidence of neurotoxicity based on clinical signs and gross pathology in an acute dermal toxicity test. Therefore, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a specific target organ toxicant following single dermal doses for neurotoxicity under GHS criteria. The confidence in the classification is low as the acute toxicity studies did not include detailed functional analyses. This classification corresponds to a C2C Green hazard rating.
CNP
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define chemicals as specific target organ toxicant following single inhalation exposures when they produce non-lethal neurotoxicity following single inhalation exposures ≤ 20 mg/L for vapors or ≤ 5 mg/L for dusts/aerosols (Categories 1 or 2) or reversible narcotic effects (defined as ataxia, narcosis, lethargy, and lack of coordination righting reflex) at any concentration (Category 3). The surrogate aluminum chloride hydroxide sulfate produced lethargy in rats at 1.6 mg/L in an acute inhalation toxicity test. However, they are likely the results of exposure to an irritating substance rather than specific narcotic effects, as it appeared among other clinical signs of irritation/general toxicity, such as piloerection and hunched posture. Regardless, the surrogate aluminum chloride hydroxide sulfate was tested only up to an aerosol concentration of 1.6 mg/L after correction for evaporable water content, insufficient data are available to determine if it produces systemic toxicity at aerosol concentrations ≤ 5 mg/L. Therefore, GHS classification is not possible for this endpoint. This corresponds to a C2C Grey rating.
Cat 2
Rationale
Soluble aluminum compounds produced behavioral changes in Sprague-Dawley rats that occurred at doses that don’t allow for classification under GHS or under conditions where measurement of the ingested dose are difficult (i.e., reduced water consumption in a drinking water exposure study). The study performed with male albino rats did not have a dose that was specified. However, spongioform changes of the brain similar to those associated with Alzheimer’s disease were identified in this study. In addition, there have been reports of neurotoxic effects with accidental aluminum exposure in humans. The human data are not sufficiently convincing to warrant GHS Category 1 classification, but when considered with the animal studies demonstrating neurological effects, GHS Category 2 classification is justified. Therefore, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 2 specific target organ toxicant following repeated oral exposures for neurotoxicity. The confidence in the classification is low due to insufficient quantitative data in animals to accurately classify the compound under GHS. The GHS Category 2 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Yellow.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
CNP
Rationale
No data.
NC
Rationale
Based on the negative skin sensitization results for aluminum chloride, basic in a guinea pig maximization test supported by negative skin sensitization results for the surrogate aluminum sulfate in a local lymph node assay, ToxServices did not classify aluminum chloride, basic as a skin sensitizer under GHS criteria (UN 2023). The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data for the target chemical and a strong surrogate. The stimulation indices ≤ 1.6 for the surrogate in the local lymph node assay corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Yellow.
Cat 1B
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define Category 1B respiratory sensitizers as “substances showing a low to moderate frequency of occurrence in humans; or a probability of occurrence of low to moderate sensitization rate in humans based on animal or other tests.” Based on the low occurrence of asthmatic reactions in workers exposed to aluminum compounds, ToxServices conservatively classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 1B respiratory sensitizer. The confidence in the score is low because it is not possible to conclusively attribute reactions to aluminum. The GHS Category 1B classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
Cat 1
Rationale
Surrogate aluminum chloride is corrosive in vivo and in vitro, due to the production of hydrochloric acid in water. However, the target chemical contains varying levels of hydroxide, which is expected to neutralize the hydrochloric acid produced in water, at least to some extent. A 35% aluminum chloride, basic was not irritating in a standard skin irritation study in rabbits. However, the ratio of hydroxyl and chloride groups is not reported, and the substance was not tested up to 100%., Therefore, based on the corrosive effects produced by the surrogate aluminum chloride, ToxServices conservatively classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 1 skin irritant. The confidence in the classification is low as the target chemical may be less irritating/corrosive due to the presence of hydroxyl groups in the formula. The GHS Category 1 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
Cat 1
Rationale
Based on the corrosive effects to rabbit eyes in an in vivo study, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a Category 1 eye irritant under GHS criteria (UN 2023). The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data for the target chemical and is supported by the classification assigned by the REACH dossier authors and a majority of EU notifiers. The GHS Category 1 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
Cat 1
Rationale
GHS criteria (UN 2023) define Category 1 acute aquatic toxicants as chemicals with 72-hour EC50s ≤ 1 mg/L in algae. Based on the equivalent 72-hour growth rate EC50 of 0.77 mg aluminum chloride, basic/L derived from the measured value for the surrogate aluminum chloride hydroxide sulfate, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 1 acute aquatic toxicant towards algae. Although the 72-hour yield EC50 for the surrogate was lower than the growth rate EC50 (0.075 mg/L vs. 0.24 mg/L), GHS criteria Section 4.1.2.9.1 specifies classification should be based on growth rate inhibition if the data are available. Therefore, ToxServices used the growth rate EC50 as the critical value, although use of either value would still support classification as a GHS Category 1 acute aquatic toxicant. The confidence in the classification is low as the dissolved aluminum concentration from aluminum chloride, basic varies based on pH, and the ratio of hydroxide and chloride. The Category 1 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
Cat 1
Rationale
Aluminum chloride, basic is not rapidly biodegradable (see persistence section). GHS criteria (UN 2023) define non-rapidly biodegradable chemicals with chronic aquatic toxicity data as Category 1 chronic aquatic toxicants when they produce chronic aquatic toxicity values ≤ 0.1 mg/L. Based on the equivalent 72-hour growth rate NOEC of 0.06 mg aluminum chloride, basic/L derived from the measured value for the surrogate aluminum chloride hydroxide sulfate, ToxServices classified aluminum chloride, basic as a GHS Category 1 chronic aquatic toxicant towards algae. Although the 72-hour yield NOEC for the surrogate was lower than the growth rate EC50 (< 0.02 mg/L vs. 0.02 mg/L), GHS criteria Section 4.1.2.9.1 specifies classification should be based on growth rate inhibition if the data are available. Therefore, ToxServices used the growth rate NOEC as the critical value, although use of either value would still support classification as a GHS Category 1 acute aquatic toxicant. The confidence in the classification is low as the dissolved aluminum concentration from aluminum chloride, basic varies based on pH, and the ratio of hydroxide and chloride. The Category 1 classification corresponds to a C2C hazard rating of Red.
NC
Rationale
Aluminum chloride, basic is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol (and therefore is not classified as GHS Category 1 for ozone layer hazards), as a greenhouse gas in the IPCC report, or as an EPA ozone depleting substance with global warming potential. In addition, it is not an organohalogen and is not expected to be volatile since it is an inorganic salt. Therefore, a rating of Green is assigned according to C2C v.4.0 criteria. Confidence is high as it is based on list-checking.
Other
  • Explosives: Not classified
  • Flammable Gases: Not classified
  • Aerosols: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Gases: Not classified
  • Flammable Liquids: Not classified
  • Flammable Solids: Not classified
  • Self-reactive substances and mixtures: Not classified
  • Pyrophoric Liquids: Not classified
  • Pyrophoric Solids: Not classified
  • Self-heating Substances and Mixtures: Not classified
  • Substances and Mixtures which in contact with water, emit flammable gases: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Liquids: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Solids: Not classified
  • Organic Peroxides: Not classified
  • Corrosive to Metals: Category 1
  • Desensitized Explosives: Not classified

How to read the C2CC Hazard Summary Table

Human Health
Environmental
Other
 
Carcinogenicity
Mutagenicity
Reproductive & Developmental Toxicity
Endocrine Activity / Disruption
Oral Toxicity
Dermal Toxicity
Inhalation Toxicity
Neurotoxicity
Skin, Eye, and Respiratory Corrosion/Irritation
Sensitization of Skin and Airways
Fish Toxicity
Daphnia Toxicity
Algae Toxicity
Terrestrial Toxicity
Persistence
Bioaccumulation
Climatic Relevance
Other (Human Health)
Organohalogens
Toxic Metals
Other (Environmental Health)
Oral
Dermal
Inhalation
G
-
-
R
R
-
-
Y
Rationale
Based on the available evidence indicating aluminum chloride, basic may interfere with estrogen signaling at high concentrations in vitro, ToxServices assigned a C2C hazard rating of Yellow for this endpoint. Although developmental toxicities were identified for soluble aluminum compounds in animals, there was no evidence that these effects were mediated through an endocrine disruption mechanism. The confidence in this classification is low as no in vivo data are available to corroborate the endocrine activity.
G
G
R
Y
G
-
R
R
R
R
R
G
-
Rationale
As an inorganic salt, aluminum chloride, basic will dissociate into its component ions but will not undergo biodegradation. Based on the recalcitrant nature of aluminum, aluminum chloride, basic is not rapidly degradable under GHS. The confidence is low as no experimental data are identified. The C2C rating for inorganic chemicals such as the target chemical is Grey.
G
Rationale
Based on BCFs up to 215 for aluminum, aluminum chloride, basic has a low concern for bioaccumulation. The BCF of 215 is below the C2C BCF threshold of 500 for a Green hazard rating and the GHS threshold of 500 for bioaccumulative substances. Therefore, ToxServices assigned a C2C hazard rating of Green for this endpoint. The confidence in the classification is high as it is based on reliable measured data for aluminum.
G
R
Rationale
Aluminum chloride, basic is not flammable, explosive, or oxidizing; is not known to enhance skin penetration; and is not a VOC. It is however classified as GHS Category 1 corrosive to metals (H290); accordingly a Red hazard rating is assigned for C2C.
G
G
G
Rationale
No other environmental concerns were identified based on data or physicochemical properties. Aluminum chloride, basic is not a chelator, and is classified as a Class I – Low Hazard to Waters classified under WGK. Accordingly a Green hazard rating is assigned for C2C.