Propanedioic acid, 1,3-diethyl ester
CASRN#
105-53-3
INCI Name
DIETHYL MALONATE
Alternate Names
Ethyl Malonate; Diethyl Propanedioate; Malonic Ester; Propanedioic acid, diethyl ester; Dicarbethoxymethane; Carbethoxyacetic ester
Common Trade Names
Molecular Weight
1.6E+2 g/mol
Functional Uses
fragrance, flavor, organic synthesis reagent
Common Impurities
-
Is this a VOC?
Yes
Is this an exempt VOC?
No
Vapor Pressure
0.27 mm Hg
Octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow)
0.96
Solubility at 37 C
2.32E+3 mg/l
Boiling Point
N/A
Particle size range as aerodynamic diameter
- - - μm
Hazard Summary
C2C Chemical Rating
grey/c
GHS Health
H319
GHS Enviro
None
Assessed by
U.S. EPA Low Priority Chemical report.
Assessment Date
Jul 10, 2020
Assessment Expires
Jul 10, 2025
Verification Status
verified
Executive Summary
Diethyl malonate is a diester derivative of malonic acid, a dicarboxylic acid with two carboxyl groups (-COO-) separated by one methylene group (-CH2-). Diethyl malonate is formed by the replacement of the hydroxyl groups (-OH) of malonic acid with ethoxy groups (-OCH2CH3). The hydrogen atoms on the methylene carbon between the two carboxyl groups make this compound acidic. Because of its unique structure, diethyl malonate is reactive and functions as a reagent for organic synthesis and to make products such as barbiturates, pigments, and agrochemicals. Volatile esters are known to have fruity scents and are often used as fragrances and flavorings. Diethyl malonate is a volatile diester that occurs naturally in fruits such as grapes, strawberries, guava, melon, pineapple, and blackberries. Section 5 includes conditions of use for this chemical. NOTE: The data provided in this assessment came primarily from the US EPA final designation report, Supporting Information for Low-Priority Substance Propanedioic Acid, 1,3-Diethyl Ester (Diethyl Malonate) (https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0119-0009). According to US EPA, “low-priority substance designations give the public notice of chemical substances for which the hazard and/or exposure potential is anticipated to be low or nonexistent and provides some insight into which chemical substances are likely not to need additional evaluation and risk management under TSCA.”
Hazard Tables

How to read the GHS Hazard Summary Table

 
Carcinogenicity
Mutagenicity
Reproductive Toxicity
Developmental Toxicity
Acute Toxicity
STOT-Single
STOT-Repeated
STOT- Neurotoxicity-Single
STOT- Neurotoxicity-Repeated
Skin Sensitizer
Respiratory Sensitizer
Skin Corrosion/Irritation
Serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation
Acute Aquatic Toxicity
Chronic Aquatic Toxicity
Ozone Depletion
Oral
Dermal
Inhalation
NC
Rationale
Available data is insufficient for GHS classification: diethyl malonate’s transformation profile, predictions by QSAR modeling, absence of structural alerts in the parent chemical substance, and experimental genotoxicity results provide sufficient information to indicate this chemical is unlikely to be carcinogenic.
NC
Rationale
Available data is insufficient for GHS classification: diethyl malonate’s transformation profile, predictions by QSAR modeling, absence of structural alerts in the parent chemical substance, and experimental genotoxicity results provide sufficient information to indicate this chemical is unlikely to be carcinogenic.
NC
Rationale
Available data is insufficient for GHS classification: diethyl malonate’s transformation profile, predictions by QSAR modeling, absence of structural alerts in the parent chemical substance, and experimental genotoxicity results provide sufficient information to indicate this chemical is unlikely to be carcinogenic.
NC
Rationale
Multiple studies provide sufficient information to indicate low concern for genotoxicity. Lower confidence due to use of analogs.
NC
Rationale
Lower confidence due to analogs. No reproductive effects were observed in an OECD 422 study which provides sufficient evidence to indicate low concern for reproductive toxicity.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
NC
Rationale
Lower confidence due to analogs. No developmental effects were observed in an OECD 422 study which provides sufficient evidence to indicate low concern for developmental toxicity.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
NC
Rationale
Lower confidence due to analogs. No developmental effects were observed in a developmental toxicity study which provides sufficient evidence to indicate low concern for developmental toxicity.
NC
Rationale
Multiple studies provide sufficient evidence to indicate a low concern for acute oral toxicity. Lower confidence due to analogs.
NC
Rationale
This study provides sufficient evidence to indicate a low concern for acute dermal toxicity. Lower confidence due to analogs.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
NC
Rationale
An OECD Guideline 422 study provide sufficient evidence to indicate a low concern for repeat dose oral toxicity.
CNP
Rationale
Data not available.
CNP
Rationale
While dose-to-dose extrapolation was performed to screen the potential for inhalation repeated dose toxicity, the dose levels are not high enough to confirm the GHS classification.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
Based on the absence of effects in the functional observation battery tests, negative results for bioactivity in ToxCast assays, mechanistic study results, and low-concern results for other endpoints, provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for neurotoxicity.
NC
Rationale
This study provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for skin sensitization. Lower confidence due to analogs.
NC
Rationale
No structural alerts identified provides sufficient information to indicate low concern for respiratory sensitization. Lower confidence because a lack of structural alerts is insufficient for establishing a GHS classification.
NC
Rationale
An OECD guideline 404 study provides sufficient evidence to indicate low concern for skin irritation.
Cat 2A
Rationale
An OECD Guideline 405 study provides sufficient information to indicate moderate/high concern for eye irritation.
NC
Rationale
Aquatic toxicity studies and a weight of evidence approach provide sufficient evidence to indicate a low concern for acute aquatic toxicity.
NC
Rationale
Modelling and a weight of evidence approach provide sufficient evidence to indicate a low concern for chronic aquatic toxicity.
NC
Rationale
Chemical is not on Montreal Protocol or IPCC List.
Other
  • Explosives: Not classified
  • Flammable Gases: Not classified
  • Aerosols: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Gases: Not classified
  • Flammable Liquids: Not classified
  • Flammable Solids: Not classified
  • Self-reactive substances and mixtures: Not classified
  • Pyrophoric Liquids: Not classified
  • Pyrophoric Solids: Not classified
  • Self-heating Substances and Mixtures: Not classified
  • Substances and Mixtures which in contact with water, emit flammable gases: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Liquids: Not classified
  • Oxidizing Solids: Not classified
  • Organic Peroxides: Not classified
  • Corrosive to Metals: Not classified
  • Desensitized Explosives: Not classified
  • Lactation Toxicity: Classification not possible (Data gap or insufficient data)
  • Aspiration: Classification not possible (Data gap or insufficient data)

How to read the C2CC Hazard Summary Table

Human Health
Environmental
Other
 
Carcinogenicity
Mutagenicity
Reproductive & Developmental Toxicity
Endocrine Activity / Disruption
Oral Toxicity
Dermal Toxicity
Inhalation Toxicity
Neurotoxicity
Skin, Eye, and Respiratory Corrosion/Irritation
Sensitization of Skin and Airways
Fish Toxicity
Daphnia Toxicity
Algae Toxicity
Terrestrial Toxicity
Persistence
Bioaccumulation
Climatic Relevance
Other (Human Health)
Organohalogens
Toxic Metals
Other (Environmental Health)
Oral
Dermal
Inhalation
-
-
-
G
G
-
G
-
Rationale
Data not available.
G
G
-
G
G
G
Y
G
G
G
G
-
G
Rationale
Multiple biodegradation studies provide sufficient information to indicate low concern for persistence.
G
Rationale
Based on the estimated bioaccumulation factor (BAF) value of 1.06, using the Estimation Programs Interface (EPI) Suite models, EPA has sufficient information that diethyl malonate is expected to have low potential for bioaccumulation in the environment based on the low-concern benchmark of less than 1000.
Y
G
Rationale
No additional relevant data for classification.
G
G
G
Rationale
No additional data available.